We have iPhone insurance packages for the new iPhone 4, iPhone 3G-S, iphones 3G and 2G purchased in the UK.

According to Continental Research over 1.3 million phones are stolen every year that is the strong reason to have mobile phone insurance for costly mobile phones.

Besides iphone insurance, you can have Laptop insurance, iPod insurance, PDA insurance, Game Player (Xbox etc) insurance, SatNav insurance, PSP insurance

If you have any further queries about us please browse above mentioned site and insure your mobile and other expensive gadgets soon.

Company Name: iPhoneInsurance UK
Address: 7-10 Chandos St, London W1G 9DQ
Email: coverme@iphoneinsurancecover.co.uk
Website: http://www.iphoneinsurancecover.co.uk/

“Pay Fixed” IRS (the user pays a fixed rate).

Corporate A borrowed at MIBOR +60 basis points from a Lender. Apprehensive that the MIBOR rate
would go up, and adversely affect his cost of funds, he enters into an OIS with a Bank / Institution. In
the deal Corporate A agrees to pay 9.05% fixed.

This means the Bank / Institution will pay Corporate A overnight MIBOR against which Corporate
A will pay the Bank / Institution a fixed rate of 9.05%. Note that now Corporate A is hedged
against any movement in MIBOR as whatever is the rate, he will receive the “rate” from the Bank /
Institution and pass it to the lender.

It should be remembered that the calculation are made on a daily compounding basis and the
settlement is netted and made at the end of the transaction.

Benefits of an OIS

Let us turn to the above example Corporate A has effectively hedged itself against any movements
in the MIBOR. The company has de-risked his liability book by entering into this transaction. After
entering into the OIS, Corporate A’s cost of funds in this transaction has been frozen at 9.05% (+)
0.60 = 9.65%. Note that the 60 bps is a sunk cost which Corporate A has to bear anyway.

Looking at the transaction from the perspective of Bank / Institution it might seem that it has
increased its risk by this transaction. This might not be the case. The Bank / Institution might have
had lent and created a Floating Rate asset in its books. In that portfolio it runs the risk that the
Floating Rate might fall and diminish its returns. By doing this transaction, the Bank / Institution has
effectively frozen its returns at 9.05% (ignoring whatever spread it might have earned on the asset).